SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 3361

PATNA HIGH COURT
PARTHA SARTHY, J
Kunal Kumar @ Kunal Kumar Yadav – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Amar Kumar Singh
For the Respondents: Mr. Lalan Kumar, APP

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER

2 15-01-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Gogri (Paura) P.S. Case no. 145 of 2022 registered under sections 376(DA), 341, 323, 354(B), 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, the informant states that the accused persons including the petitioner herein misbehaved with his 16 years old minor daughter. They also made a video of the occurrence and made the same viral. On protest by the informant and others, it is stated that the informant was abused and threatened that he would be beaten up.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been falsely implicated. No such occurrence as alleged has taken place. It is further submitted that the case has proceeded in the trial Court. After framing of charge, evidence of both sides have been concluded and final written argument on behalf of the petitioner has also been submitted on 9.10.2025. The petitioner is in custody since 12.12.2022. Learned counsel submits that if the Court is

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top