SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 3390

PATNA HIGH COURT
Mr. Partha Sarthy, J
Harendra Kumar Upadhyay – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Bihar – Respondent
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2043 of 2017



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners:Mr. Purushottam Kr. Jha, Advocate, Mr. Mithilesh Kumar Upadhyay, Advocate, Mr. Vijay Shankar Upadhyay, Advocate, Mr. Bishwash Vijeta, Advocate
For the Respondent/s: Mr. Ramashray Roy, AC to AAG-11

The court asserts the need for equal treatment in administrative decisions impacting staff promotions and service allocation.

Headnote:The judgment addresses a writ application where the petitioner, an engineer, contends the wrongful denial of equal treatment and promotions compared to peers in the Road Construction Department. The court underscores the necessity to review an administrative decision under relevant statutes. The determination involves the issuance of directives to government officials for equitable treatment based on akin circumstances. The court concludes the matter by allowing the petitioner to present a representation for further review.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's relief regarding promotion issues. (Para 2 , 3)
2. procedural directives for representation and decision timelines. (Para 4 , 6 , 7 , 8)
3. final disposal of the writ application. (Para 9)

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER

7 19-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.

2. The petitioner has filed the instant application for the following relief(s) :

“1. That this writ application is being filed for setting aside the resolution dated 04.02.2015 passed by the committee headed by Secretary, Road Construction Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna as well as for direction to the authorities to give equal treatment to the petitioner which are being given to the other engineers of Road Construction Department since the date they have been given such benefit and/or for any other order or orders may be passed in the fact and circumstances of the case.”

3. Subsequently the petitioner filed I.A. no.1 of 2021 praying for addition of some reliefs as stated in paragraph no.1 of the application, which are reproduced herein below :-

“i. Issuance of an order, direction or a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the Notification No. 1 / सथा० 19/2007 2777 (S) dated 25.03.2015 issued by the Additional Secretary, Road Construction Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna (Respondent No. 4) whereby petitioner's claim for the allocation of his services to the Road Construction Department has been rejected in the following terms:-

Jh "CWJC No. 21428/2013 मधुसदू न साह एवं अनय बनाम बबहार राजय एवं अनय मे बदनांक 19.02.2014 को पाबरत Øe नयायादेश के मे अवमाननावाद संखया 2895/2014 दायर है। बजसमे कु ल 8 (आठ)

सररशश याबचकाकतारओं मे से वतरमान मे

gjsUnz मधुसदू न साह (स० अ०) कु मार उपाधयाय (स० अ०), अजय कु मार (स० अ०), बबनोद chjsanz बबहारी शमार (स० अ०), कु मार (स० अ०)

xzkeh.k एवं राजेश कु मार (स० अ०) कायर बवभाग तत्रिदशप संवगर के आशतोष (स० अ०) एवं कु मार feJk (स० अ०) भवन बनमारण बवभाग संवगर के

है। (i) Jh मधुसदू न साह (स० अ०) (ii)

JhgjsUnz Jh कु मार उपाधयाय (स० अ०), (iii)

अजय कु मार (स० अ०), (iv)

Jh fcjsUnz कु मार (स० अ०) एवं (v)

Jh राजेश कु मार (स० अ०)

दारा अपना बवकलप पथ बनमारण बवभाग बदया गया है। बवभागीय संकलप संखया 6115 (एस०) बदनांक 29.07.2013 के कंबडका 5 (क) के आलोक मे इन आवेदनो को असवीकृत बकया जाता है। "

A true copy of Notification No. 1/ सथा० -19/2007 2777 (S) dated 25.03.2015 is annexed herewith as Annexure-14 to this Interlocutory Application.

ii. Issuance of an order, direction or a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the Respondents concerned to shift back the effective date of promotion to the petitioner on the post of Executive Engineer from 19.01.2018 to 24.10.2016, the day persons junior to the petitioner namely Mr. Santosh Kumar Bhatt, Mr.

Nikhilesh Kumar Sinha, Mr. Nasim Akthar Ansari, Mr. Arun Kumar Singh, Mr. Ghanshyam Mandal, Mr. Prem Nath, Syed Mumtaj Ahmad, Md. Rehan Haider and Mr. Ram Suresh Rai have been granted promotion on the post of Executive Engineer, vide Annexure - 11 at page nos. 77-78 to the main writ petition. And in turn the Respondents concerned may be suitably directed to grant all due benefits to the petitioner on the basis of the shifting back the date of his promotion on the post of Executive Engineer from

19.01.2018 to 24.10.2016.

iii. To hold and declare that since there have been no difference in between the case of the petitioner and the case of Reji Singh (Respondent No. 6), as such, the petitioner may also be granted identical and similar benefits as has been granted to said Respondent No. 6 in the matter of allocation of cadre to the Road Construction Department.

iv. For grant of any other additional relief (s) to which the petitioner may be found entitled to in the facts and circumstances of this case.”

4. It is fairly submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that during pendency of the instant application, the petitioner having retired on 31.5.2024, so far as the additional relief (i) is concerned, the same being with respect to transfer and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top