PATNA HIGH COURT
MR. PARTHA SARTHY, J
Balram Singh – Appellant
Versus
The Union of India – Respondent
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7348 of 2017
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ application disposed following withdrawal. (Para 4) |
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER counsel for the Union of India.
2. The petitioner has filed the instant application for the following reliefs :-
“A. To expunge Office Memorandum dated 30/12/14, issued by Commandant, 44th Battalion SSB. Muzaffarpur, containing downgraded APAR of Petitioner for the period from 1-04-13 to 31-3-14, as contained in Annexure- P/1.
B. To set aside Letter dated
09/01/2015, issued by Commandant, 44th Battalion SSB, Muzaffarpur, as contained in Annexure- P/3, rejecting representation of Petitioner against adverse entry in APAR.
C. To set aside Office Memorandum dated 15/01/2015, issued by Dy. Inspector General, SHQ, SSB, Muzaffarpur, as contained in Annexure- P/4.
D. To set aside Office Memorandum dated 25/02/2016 issued by Staff Officer (Adm), Office of the Inspector General, SSB, Frontier Headquarter, Patna as contained in Annexure P/11.
E. To grant any other incidental, consequential or other relief/reliefs, to which the Petitioner is found entitled and Your Lordships may deem fit in the ends of justice.”
that in view of the order contained in Letter no.696-707 dated 15.1.2020 issued under the signature of the Deputy Commandant (Estt), FHQ, Sashastra Seema Bal, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, he does not press the instant writ application and seeks permission to withdraw the same.
4. In view of the above, the writ application is disposed of as withdrawn.
(Partha Sarthy, J)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.