SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 3399

PATNA HIGH COURT
PARTHA SARTHY, J
Raubins Kumar @ Rauvinsh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioner/s: Mr. Rana Hason
For the Respondent: Mr. Anant Kumar 1, APP

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER

3 21-01-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Jehanabad P.S. Case no.641 of 2025 registered under sections 64, 115(2), 127(2) and

352 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita , 2023.

3. As per the prosecution case, the informant states that she was in a love affair with the petitioner for the last 1½ years. On the date of occurrence, the petitioner forcibly established physical relations with her on the assurance that he would marry her.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. From the contents of the F.I.R itself it would transpire that the parties being in a relationship has been admitted therein. The allegation of the petitioner establishing physical relations forcibly is incorrect and denied. It is for this reason that while the alleged occurrence is said to have taken place on 10.7.2025 and the police station being at a distance of only 1 km, information at the police station was given more than 24 hours later in the late night of 11.7.2025. The petitioner is in custody

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top