PATNA HIGH COURT
PARTHA SARTHY, J
Raubins Kumar @ Rauvinsh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER
3 21-01-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Jehanabad P.S. Case no.641 of 2025 registered under sections 64, 115(2), 127(2) and
352 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita , 2023.
3. As per the prosecution case, the informant states that she was in a love affair with the petitioner for the last 1½ years. On the date of occurrence, the petitioner forcibly established physical relations with her on the assurance that he would marry her.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. From the contents of the F.I.R itself it would transpire that the parties being in a relationship has been admitted therein. The allegation of the petitioner establishing physical relations forcibly is incorrect and denied. It is for this reason that while the alleged occurrence is said to have taken place on 10.7.2025 and the police station being at a distance of only 1 km, information at the police station was given more than 24 hours later in the late night of 11.7.2025. The petitioner is in custody
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.