SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 3401

PATNA HIGH COURT
PARTHA SARTHY, J
Raja Mahto – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.73333 of 2025 | CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 78319 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Harishankar Raj, Mr. Saurabh Kumar Priyadarshy, Mr. Gyanendra Kumar, Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Mr. Sharad Kumar Verma, Mr. Sagar Kumar, Mr. Hemant Ray
For the Respondents: Mr. Shyam Kumar Singh, APP, Mr. Mohammad Sufyan, APP

The bail may be granted when the quantity of the alleged controlled substance is below the commercial threshold and the accused have no prior criminal records.

Headnote:{'first_paragraph': 'The petitioners applied under section 111 (2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and sections 8, 23(c), 20(b)(ii)

(C), 25 and 29 of the N.D.P.S. Act, contending that 14 kgs of ganja were allegedly recovered from them. They argued false implication and absence of prior criminal records.', 'second_paragraph': 'The court framed issues regarding the credibility of the recovery and the petitioners’ detention as factors influencing bail status. The reasoning relied on the amount of seized substance being below commercial levels and lack of past criminal activity.', 'last_paragraph': 'Both the petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each.'}

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER

3 21-01-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioners have preferred this application for of 2025 registered under section 111 (2) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and sections 8, 23(c), 20 (b)(ii)(C), 25 and 29 of the N.D.P.S. Act .

3. As per the prosecution case, 14 kgs each of ganja was recovered from the possession of two petitioners herein.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case. No incriminating article has been recovered from their possession. They have no criminal antecedent and are in custody since 26.5.2025. Charge-sheet has been submitted in the case. Co- accused Naval Prasad Yadav has been enlarged on bail vide order dated 12.12.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. no.84037 of 2025.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegation against the petitioners, the ganja recovered having been said to be much below the commercial quantity, the petitioners having remained in custody since 26.5.2025, charge-sheet having been submitted in the case and especially the petitioners not having any criminal antecedent, both the petitioners are directed to be enlarged on of them furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge/Special Judge, East Champaran, Motihari.

(Partha Sarthy, J)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top