PATNA HIGH COURT
PARTHA SARTHY, J
Md Azam @ Mohd.Azam – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER
3 21-01-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Dagarua P.S. Case no.70 of 2025, registered under section 105, 110 and 287 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita , 2023.
3. As per the prosecution case, the informant states that the petitioner who are neighbours of the father of the informant were involved in illegal sale of petrol and diesel. As a result of an accident, fire started and in the same the father of the informant died. Others were also injured.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. He has been falsely implicated in the case for the reason of his being the son of Md.
Hasim. Md. Hasim has been enlarged on bail vide order dated 16.12.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. no.86223 of 2025. The petitioner who has no criminal antecedent is in custody since 4.8.2025 and charge-sheet has been submitted in the case.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant. Learned A.P.P. for the State has referred to different paragraphs of the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.