PATNA HIGH COURT
Partha Sarthy, J
Sunil Ray – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER
3 21-01-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Sessions Trial no.206 of 2025 (arising out of Pothia P.S. Case no.104 of 2025) registered under sections 137(2) and 96 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita , 2023.
3. As per the prosecution case, the informant states that his minor daughter who had gone to her aunt’s house did not return and was not to be found inspite of search. Subsequently a mobile number was discovered in his daughter’s room. On calling the said number, the informant states that the person on the other side disconnected the telephone.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was falsely implicated in the case in course of investigation. The daughter of the informant is a major and had gone with the petitioner out of her own free will. She returned and her statement was recorded under section 183 B.N.S.S. wherein she has not supported the prosecution case. It has also come in paragraph no.89 of the case diary that she has refused to undergo medical examination and has categorically stated that t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.