SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 3421

PATNA HIGH COURT
PARTHA SARTHY, J
Karu Yadav @ Sajan Gopal – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Sanjay Prasad
For the Respondents: Mr. Yogendra Kumar Singh, APP

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER

2 28-01-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner in this application prays for bail apprehending his arrest in connection with Rajgir P.S. Case no.56 of 2023 registered for the offence punishable under sections 307, 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 325 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act . 3. As per the prosecution case, the informant states that over a trivial dispute relating to immersion of idol on the occasion of Saraswati Puja, six named accused persons including the petitioner herein as also 10 unknown accused persons came variously armed and assaulted the informant and others causing injuries.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. There is case and counter case between the parties and the correct manner of the occurrence having been narrated in the counter case, FIR of which is annexed as P/2 to the petition. It is submitted that the allegations are general and omnibus in nature and even the injury which finds mention in the order of the learned trial Court and though has been found to be grievous in nature

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top