SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 3422

PATNA HIGH COURT
PARTHA SARTHY, J
Manoj Sao @ Manoj Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sharma
For the Respondents: Mr. Rana Randhir Singh

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER

2 28-01-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner in this application prays for bail apprehending his arrest in connection with Pipariya P.S. Case no.32 of 2011 registered for the offence punishable under sections 420, 406 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code . 3. As per the prosecution case, the informant states that he was lured by Rajendra Sao of getting him work on the payment of Rs.50,000/. It is stated that after 3-4 days of the promise, Rajendra Sao along with his son ie the petitioner herein came to his house where the informant paid a sum of Rs.50,000/ to Rajendra Sao. However, neither the said Rajendra Sao got him the work nor did he return him the amount. On going and demanding the amount, it is stated that the petitioner told the informant that he had not taken any amount and as such, the same would not be returned.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. The allegation is solely against Rajendra Sao ie the father of the petitioner and not the petitioner herein who is alleged only to have accompanied his father. It is further submitte

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top