SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 3425

PATNA HIGH COURT
PARTHA SARTHY, J
Mukhi Kamat – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3783 of 2026 | PS. Case No.-35 Year-2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Ghosarvey
For the Respondents:Mr. Rabindra Kumar, APP, Mr. Gagan Deo Yadav, Advocate, Mr. U.K. Yadav, Advocate

Anticipatory bail granted based on lack of specific allegations and absence of criminal antecedent.

Headnote:The petitioners seek anticipatory bail in connection with Khirhar P.S. Case No. 35 of 2025, involving serious allegations under the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution claims petitioners participated in an assault leading to grievous injuries. The court finds no specific allegations against Mukhi Kamat while considering the lack of criminal antecedent. The court grants bail to both petitioners upon providing a bond and sureties.

Result: The petitioners to be released on anticipatory bail.

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER

2 28-01-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioners in this application pray for grant of anticipatory bail apprehending their arrest in connection with Khirhar P.S. Case no. 35 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under sections 126(2), 115(2), 76, 109, 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita , 2023 3. As per the prosecution case, the informant states that the fourteen named accused persons including the two petitioners herein came variously armed. It is further stated that on the orders of Bhogi Kamat, Bhogi Kamat assaulted the wife of the informant with a sharp cutting Khanti on her head causing grievous injury. Further Ranjeet Kamat outraged her modesty and thereafter Sukhi Kamat is said to have assaulted with an iron rod.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case. The allegation of assault with the Khanti or an iron rod is not on the petitioners herein. In fact, there is no allegation of assault so far as the petitioner no.1 Mukhi Kamat is concerned. The petitioners have no criminal antecedent and undertake to cooperate in the investigation.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant. Learned counsel for the informant submits that the petitioners are named in the FIR and there is direct allegation against them of having actively participated in the assault wherein grievous injury was sustained by the informant and the members of his family.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegations against the petitioners in the FIR, the allegation of assault being specific on Bhogi Kamat and Sukhi Kamat and not the petitioners herein together with the petitioners not having any criminal antecedent, it is directed that both the petitioners above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks, be released on anticipatory bail in connection with Khirhar P.S. Case no.35 of 2025 on each of them furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani.

(Partha Sarthy, J)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top