PATNA HIGH COURT
PARTHA SARTHY, J
Mukhi Kamat – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER
2 28-01-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The petitioners in this application pray for grant of anticipatory bail apprehending their arrest in connection with Khirhar P.S. Case no. 35 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under sections 126(2), 115(2), 76, 109, 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita , 2023 3. As per the prosecution case, the informant states that the fourteen named accused persons including the two petitioners herein came variously armed. It is further stated that on the orders of Bhogi Kamat, Bhogi Kamat assaulted the wife of the informant with a sharp cutting Khanti on her head causing grievous injury. Further Ranjeet Kamat outraged her modesty and thereafter Sukhi Kamat is said to have assaulted with an iron rod.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case. The allegation of assault with the Khanti or an iron rod is not on the petitioners herein. In fact, there is no allegation of assault so far as the petitioner no.1 Mukhi Kamat is concerned. The petitioners have no criminal antecedent and undertake to
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.