SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 3426

PATNA HIGH COURT
Mr. Partha Sarthy, J
Rambabu Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3813 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh
For the Respondents: Mrs. Pushpa Sinha, APP

Anticipatory bail granted when allegations against petitioners are general, and primary assault accusations are against another individual.

Headnote:The petitioners seek anticipatory bail for their alleged involvement under various sections of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023, whereupon they contend their false implication amid counter allegations. The court finds the allegations general against the petitioners, directing bail on conditions for cooperation in the ongoing investigation. The ruling articulates the balance of allegations primarily pressing against a co-accused and not the petitioners themselves.

Result: The petitioners to be released on anticipatory bail upon specified terms.

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER

2 28-01-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioners in this application pray for grant of anticipatory bail apprehending their arrest in connection with Motihari Mufassil P.S. Case no. 574 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under sections 103, 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109, 352, 351(2), 351(3) and 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita , 2023.

3. As per the prosecution case, the six named accused persons including the petitioners herein are said to have come variously armed. The informant states that they started to hurl abuses. On protest by the informant, Bhagelu Das is said to have forcibly taken the informant where after Bhushan Das struck him with an iron rod as a result of which he sustained injuries in his right hand. Thereafter Chandan Kumar and Santosh Kumar assaulted with lathi and rod. On the son of the informant coming to his rescue, it is stated that Bhushan Kumar struck him with an iron rod on the head as a result of which, he fell down unconscious. On hulla being raised, the accused persons went away giving threats.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case. There is case and counter case between the parties. The allegation of the assault is on Bhushan Das. On others including the petitioners herein, the allegations are general and omnibus in nature. The allegation of the assault on the son of the informant is not on the petitioners herein but on Bhushan Das. The petitioners undertake to cooperate in the investigation/trial.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegation against the petitioners in the FIR, allegation of assault being mainly on Bhushan Das and not the petitioners herein, in the facts of the case, it is directed that the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks, be released on anticipatory bail in connection with Motihari Mufassil P.S. Case no. 574 of 2025 on each of them furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari.

(Partha Sarthy, J)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top