SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 3429

PATNA HIGH COURT
Mr. Partha Sarthy, J
Md. Afsar @ Afsar Siddaqui @ Afasar Siddhaki – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3885 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Mahendra Pratap
For the Respondents: Mr. Bharat Lal, APP

Anticipatory bail was granted considering the nature of the injury as non-vital and the lack of criminal antecedents of the petitioners.

Headnote:The petitioners applied for anticipatory bail in a case involving assault leading to grievous injuries under sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 352 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The court acknowledged the nature of the injury, found it to be on a non-vital part of the body, and noted the petitioners' lack of criminal antecedents, ultimately granting them bail. The main issue was whether the allegations warranted anticipatory bail, with the court observing the serious nature of the injuries against a backdrop of trivial disputes.

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER

2 28-01-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioners have preferred this application for grant of anticipatory bail apprehending their arrest in connection with Samastipur Muffasil P.S. Case no. 411 of 2024 registered under sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 352 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita , 2023.

3. As per the prosecution case, the informant states that over a dispute relating to parking of a loaded commercial vehicle and giving passage, the three accused persons assaulted the informant with an iron rod leading to injuries.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case. From the contents of the FIR itself, it would transpire that the dispute was of a trivial nature. So far as the injury on the informant is concerned, the only injury on the shoulder and wrist has been found to be grievous in nature which is attributable to petitioner no. 3 only. Even this assault is on a non-vital part of the body. The petitioners have no criminal antecedent and undertake to cooperate in the investigation/trial.

5. The application for anticipatory bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegations against the petitioners in the F.I.R., the only injury found to be grievous in nature being on non-vital part of the body together with the petitioners not having any criminal antecedent, it is directed that all the three petitioners above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks, be released on anticipatory bail in connection with Samastipur Muffasil P.S. Case no. 411 of 2024 on each of them furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-II, Samastipur.

(Partha Sarthy, J)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top