SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 3437

PATNA HIGH COURT
PARTHA SARTHY, J
Raushan Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6100 of 2026|PS. Case No.-430 Year-2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Jay Ram Prasad, Mr. Niranjan Kumar Singh
For the Respondents: Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay

The court grants bail due to prolonged custody and submission of charge-sheet, acknowledging the possibility of false implication.

Headnote:This judgment addresses an application for bail concerning the Khajekala P.S. Case No.430 of 2025 under Section 310(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The petitioner contended he was falsely implicated based on a co-accused's statement. Considering the ongoing custody and charge-sheet submission, the court determined that bail is warranted. The bail application faced opposition from the state representative, yet the court found sufficient grounds for bail. Final ruling: The petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties.

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER

2 04-02-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Khajekala P.S. Case no.430 of 2025, registered under section 310(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita , 2023.

3. As per the prosecution case, the two accused persons on the point of pistol committed robbery in the house of the informant. They took away various articles including the hard-disk of the CCTV camera, mobile phone etc.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the F.I.R. was registered against six unknown. The name of the order of the learned trial Court it is submitted that the petitioner was falsely implicated in the case in the confessional statement of co-accused Md. Raja made before police wherein he has stated that the petitioner participated in the occurrence. The contents of the order further states that on a raid being conducted subsequent to the said confessional statement, the petitioner along with others were caught and from the possession of the petitioner Rs.15000/- in cash, a mobile phone and a live cartridge was recovered. The petitioner is in custody since 18.10.2025 and charge-sheet has been submitted in the case. It is further submitted that the said mobile phone belongs to the petitioner himself and it has not been put on T.I. Parade.

The petitioner undertakes to cooperate in the investigation/trial.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegations in the F.I.R., the discussed in detail in the order of the learned trial Court, the petitioner having remained in custody since 18.10.2025 and charge-sheet having been submitted in the case, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Khajekala P.S. Case no.430 of 2025, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-

(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Masaurhi, Patna.

(Partha Sarthy, J)

avinash/- U T

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top