SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 3525

PATNA HIGH COURT
Prabhat Kumar Singh, J
Hemant Kumar Yadav – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61540 of 2024 | PS. Case No.-137 Year-2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.Yogesh Kumar
For the Respondents: Mr.Zainul Abedin, A.P.P., Mr.Bijay Prakash Singh

Bail granted contingent upon fulfilling conditions of financial support and court satisfaction amidst allegations of dowry and torture.

Headnote:This order pertains to the petition for bail under various sections of the IPC and D.P. Act. The petitioner, husband of the opposite party, is accused of demanding dowry and torturing the informant. The court allowed bail on certain conditions including a financial undertaking by the petitioner and an affidavit from the informant for communication of relief to be provided. The court emphasized the importance of resolving the issue amicably through mediation or trial proceedings. The bail was conditioned on satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate and the payment of temporary relief to the informant.

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

7 08-01-2026 Pursuant to order of this Court, the matter was referred to Mediation & Conciliation Center of Patna High Court, but the dispute between the parties could not be resolved through the process of mediation and as such, mediation failed (Report kept at flag ‘M’).

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, the State and the informant.

3. The petitioner, who is husband of opposite party no.2, apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 341, 323, 354B, 504, 506, 498A, 494, 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code and sections 3/4 of the D.P.

Act.

4. Prosecution case in brief is that opposite party no.2 was married with the petitioner in 2017. After marriage, this petitioner along with other accused persons started demanding Rs. 1 lac as dowry and on non-fulfillment of the same they used to assault and torture her. Lastly, accused persons ousted opposite party no.2 from her matrimonial house.

5. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, while denying the allegations, submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case because he happens to be husband of opposite party no.2. Petitioner is ready to keep her with honour and safety. Besides this, petitioner is ready to give Rs. 5000/-per month to the informant by way of temporary relief/solace, starting from this month, subject to any order passed in matrimonial, maintenance or connected proceedings.

6. Learned counsel for the State as well as the informant oppose the prayer for bail. Learned counsel for informant submits that the petitioner, being husband of informant, in connivance with his family members, subjected her to harassment and cruelty for non-fulfillment of demand of dowry and also ousted her to her parents’ house. It is further submitted that she has no means of livelihood and is on the verge of starvation.

7. In view of the undertaking of learned counsel for the petitioner as well as condition of informant, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the petitioner, above-named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate 1st class, Siwan in Aandar Police Station Case No. 137 of 2024, subject to the conditions laid down under section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 as well as on the following conditions:-

(i) Informant would file an affidavit before the court below and bring on record her saving bank account number for its communication to the petitioner.

relief per month in the saving bank account of the informant.

amount of temporary relief/solace for two consecutive months, the court below would be at liberty to cancel the bail-bond.

(iv) The aforementioned payment will be subject to any order passed in matrimonial, maintenance or connected proceedings. The present order, in no way, will preclude the parties to resolve the issue otherwise.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

Shashi U T

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top