Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
Prabhat Kumar Singh, J
Ganesh Sahu @ Ganesh Sah – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of the allegations and context of the case presented. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. court’s decision on bail considering the nature of accusations. (Para 9 , 10) |
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
3 15-01-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.
2. At the outset, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory bail application on behalf of Petitioner No. 1, namely Ganesh Sahu.
3. Permission, as prayed for, is accorded.
4. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application with regard to Petitioner No. 1 stands dismissed as withdrawn.
5. Petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109(1), 352, 351(2), 3(5) and 303(2) of the B.N.S. .
6. As per prosecution case, Petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 are alleged to have assaulted son and daughter-in-law of informant with bricks.
7. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. Specific accusation of assault is
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
