Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH, S. B. PD. SINGH, JJ
SUBODH YADAV – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. consideration of custody duration and hearing timelines in bail decisions. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. court's observation on the suspension of sentence. (Para 5) |
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. B. PD. SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH)
10 16-01-2026 At the outset, it is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant that appellant Sadanand Yadav in Cr. APP (DB) No. 705 of 2019 and appellant Sunil Yadav in Cr. APP (DB) No. 718 of 2019 have already been released on bail vide order dated 25.10.2019.
Re: I.A. No. 1 of 2025 in Cr. APP (DB) No. 790 of 2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. This interlocutory application has been filed for suspension of sentence and for grant of bail to the appellant during pendency of the appeal.
3. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that lastly prayer for bail of the appellant was refused by this Court vide order dated 25.10.2019 and 15.12.2021.
4. Thereafter, learned counsel for the appellant has filed I.A. No. 2 of 2023, which was disposed of as withdrawn vide order dated 17.01.2025.
5. It is further submitted by learned counsel fo
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
