SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 3639

PATNA HIGH COURT
Mr. Prabhat Kumar Singh, J
Amir Khan @ Ameer Khan – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62115 of 2025 | PS. Case No.-300 Year-2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Parwej Khan
For the Respondents: Mr. Pradeep Narain Kumar, A.P.P., Mr. Sonu Singh

The court established the conditions for bail based on financial support and circumstances of the opposite party's distress.

Headnote:The court considered the allegations under IPC sections 341, 323, 498A and section 4 of the D.P. Act against the petitioner, who was apprehensive of arrest. The facts indicate a demand for dowry leading to distress for the opposite party. The petitioner contended innocence, asserting willingness to provide temporary financial support. The court outlined conditions for bail contingent upon the petitioner's compliance with financial responsibilities and the opposite party's affidavit submission. Resulting in granting bail upon specific terms.

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

3 19-01-2026 Pursuant to order of this Court, the matter was referred to Mediation & Conciliation Center of Patna High Court, but the dispute between the parties could not be resolved through the process of mediation and as such, mediation failed (Report kept at flag ‘M’).

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, the State and the opposite party no.2.

3. The petitioner, who is husband of opposite party no.2, apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 341, 323 and 498A of the Indian Penal Code and section 4 of the D.P. Act .

4. Prosecution case in brief is that opposite party no.2 was married with the petitioner in 2024. After marriage, this petitioner along with other accused persons started demanding Rs. 3 lacs and a motorcycle as dowry and on non-fulfillment of the same they used to assault and torture her. Lastly, accused persons ousted opposite party no.2 from her matrimonial house.

5. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, while denying the allegations, submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case because he happens to be husband of opposite party no.2. Petitioner is ready to keep her with honour and safety. Besides this, petitioner is ready to give Rs. 3000/-per month to opposite party no.2 by way of temporary relief/solace, starting from this month, subject to any order passed in matrimonial, maintenance or connected proceedings.

6. Learned counsel for the State as well as opposite party no.2 oppose the prayer for bail. Learned counsel for opposite party no.2 submits that the petitioner, being husband of opposite party no.2, in connivance with his family members, subjected her to harassment and cruelty for non-fulfillment of demand of dowry and also ousted her to her parents’ house. It is further submitted that she has no means of livelihood and is on the verge of starvation.

7. In view of the undertaking of learned counsel for the petitioner as well as condition of opposite party no.2, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the petitioner, above-named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Kaimur at Bhabua in Complaint Case No. 300 of 2024, subject to the conditions laid down under section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 as well as on the following conditions:-

(i) Opposite party no.2. would file an affidavit before the court below and bring on record her saving bank account number for its communication to the petitioner.

(ii) Petitioner would deposit the aforesaid interim relief per month in the saving bank account of the opposite party no.2.

(iii) In case, petitioner fails to deposit the aforesaid amount of temporary relief/solace for two consecutive months, the court below would be at liberty to cancel the bail-bond.

(iv) The aforementioned payment will be subject to any order passed in matrimonial, maintenance or connected proceedings. The present order, in no way, will preclude the parties to resolve the issue otherwise.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

Shashi U T

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top