SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 3646

PATNA HIGH COURT
Prabhat Kumar Singh, J
Umashankar Rai @ Umashankar Prasad – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Rahul Singh
For the Respondents: Mrs. Dr. Indiwar Kumari

Pre-arrest bail granted when no overt act proven against the accused.

Headnote:This case involved the application for pre-arrest bail concerning the offence punishable under various sections of the BNS applicable to the petitioners. The informant alleged that, on 03.06.2025, the accused collectively assaulted the informant's brother. The Court determined that while the petitioners 2 and 3 had criminal antecedents, petitioner No. 1 was only alleged to have ordered the assault without direct involvement. The Court rejected the bail pleas for petitioners 2 and 3 but granted pre-arrest bail to petitioner No. 1, citing no specific overt act. The final ruling allowed petitioner No. 1 to be released on bail on specific conditions.

Table of Content
1. allegations of assault without specificity. (Para 4)
2. court's decision to reject bail based on accusations. (Para 6)
3. conditional bail granted based on lack of overt act. (Para 7)

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

2 20-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State .

2. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 191 ( 2 ), 190, 126 ( 2 ), 115 ( 2 ), 118 (1) , 109 (1) , 303 ( 2 ), 352 and

351 ( 2 ) of BNS .

3 . As per F.I.R., informant alleged that on

03.06.2025 , all the accusd persons including petitioners armed with lathi, danda , iron rod and farsa came and on the order of petitioner No. 1 petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 assaulted brother of informant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that petitioners are innocent and has committed no offence as alleged. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus against petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 . No specific allegation of any overt act is alleged against petitioner No. 1 and he is only alleged to be order giver.

5 . Learned counsel for the State opposed the bail petition and submitted that petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 assaulted brother of informant and have got 8 criminal antecedents.

6. Considering the nature of accusation against petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 , the prayer for pre – arrest bail of petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 is rejected.

7. Considering the fact that petitioner No. 1 is only alleged to be order giver and other circumstances of the case , in the event of arrest or surrender within eight weeks from today, let the petitioner No. 1 , as named above , be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM Sikrahana at Dhaka East Champaran Motihari in connection with Ghorasahan P.S. Case No. 177 of 2025 , subject to the conditions laid down under section 482 ( 2 ) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita ( BNSS ) , 2023 .

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top