SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 3649

PATNA HIGH COURT
Prabhat Kumar Singh, J
Himanshu Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Abhishek Kumar
For the Respondents: Ms. Rina Sinha, A.P.P.

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

2 20-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.

2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341 , 323, 324, 325, 307, 379, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code .

3. As per prosecution case, all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including these petitioners assaulted son of the informant as a result of which he sustained multiple injuries and one of the injuries is grievous in nature.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that specific accusation of assault is against co-accused Sanju Mahto, Dhruv Mahto and Rikesh Mahto and petitioner no. 2. So far rest of the petitioners are concerned, allegation against them is general and omnibus and there is no specific allegation of any overt act against them. Petitioners claim clean antecedent.

5. Learned counsel for the State opposed the bail application and submits that petitioner No. 2 assaulted son of the informant as a result of which he sustained grievous injury.

6. In view of the fact that petitioner No. 2 caused grievous injury, prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioner No.

2 is refused

7. H

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top