SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 3658

PATNA HIGH COURT
Prabhat Kumar Singh, J
Praphul Kumar @ Praful Kumar Jha – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.786 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners:Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Adarash Prasar, Advocate, Mr. Mayank Raj, Advocate, Mr. Rahul Singh, Advocate, Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sharma, Advocate
For the Respondents: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary, APP

Bail granted under specified conditions pending trial, emphasizing non-adjudication of merits.

Headnote:The petitioner, apprehending arrest for offences under sections 419, 420, and 120 B of IPC and 3/4 of the D.P Act, seeks bail. The court acknowledges the petitioner's willingness to deposit a significant sum without admitting guilt. The bail is granted with specific conditions. The order's issuance does not adjudicate the merits of the case, emphasizing the bail is provisional pending the case's final outcome.

Table of Content
1. court's decision to grant bail under specified conditions. (Para 6)

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

2 21-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State .

2. The petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 419, 420 and 120 B of IPC and 3/ 4 of the D. P Act.

3 . As per the prosecution case , this petitioner along with other co-accused persons took Rs. 9,00,000/- from the informant as dowry, to solemnize marriage of the informant’s daughter with petitioner, but later on, petitioner refused to marry or return the money .

4. At the outset learned counsel for the petitioner Mr.

Ramakant Sharma submitted that petitioner without admitting his guilt and without prejudice to his right and contention , states that the petitioner is ready to deposit Rs. 8,50,000/- in installments within six months in the Nazarat of the concerned Civil Court.

5 . Considering the aforesaid facts of the case, prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of arrest/surrender within eight weeks from today, let the petitioner, mentioned above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Darbhanga in connection with LNMU , P S Case No. 169 of 2017, subject to the conditions laid down under section

482 ( 2 ) of BNSS 2023 as well as on following conditions:-

(i) At the time of furnishing bail bond, Rs. 5 lacs concerned Court below .

(ii) Rest amount of Rs. 3 lacs 50 thousand shall be (iii) If the petitioner fails to comply with the aforesaid direction of this court, the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

6. It is made clear that without going into the merit of the case, aforesaid order has been passed only for the purpose of grant of bail and this deposit would be subject to the final result of the criminal case .

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top