SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 3660

PATNA HIGH COURT
Prabhat Kumar Singh, J
Abhishek Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar Patna – Respondent
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.823 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Santosh Kumar
For the Respondents: Mr. Shaheen Begum

Adult consensual relationships are not criminally penalizable under false pretenses if both parties are aware of implications.

Headnote:The judgment discusses the complaint against the petitioner under sections 69 of BNS and 3/4 of the D.P. Act, involving a relationship that lasted a year. The court finds no criminal offense as both parties were consenting adults, the purported promise of marriage not translating into coercion or false pretense. It concludes that the petitioner should be granted bail conditions. The issues raised concern the nature of consent and criminal responsibility in intimate relationships. The court rationalizes that adult consensual relationships shouldn't be penalized post-factum. The final result permits bail for the petitioner under specified conditions.

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

2 21-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, informant and the State .

2. Petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 69 of BNS and 3/ 4 of the D. P Act.

3 . The prosecution case , in brief, is that informant was in longstanding relationship with the petitioner, who allegedly promised to marry her. Based on the said promise, the informant entered into physical relationship with the petitioner. Relationship lasted for one year and thereafter, petitioner and other accused persons started demanding dowry and later on this petitioner refused to marry her.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that prosecution case set out in the F.I.R. is false and concocted. The informant was major and was conscious of all consequences of intimate relationship which continued for one year. The act of repeated intimacy and sexual relationship was totally consensual in nature and was not established under any false promise , threat or coercion . He further submits that it is a case of long voluntary love affair between two consenting adults which had been given a colour of forcibly sexual intercourse with oblique purpose and motive . Petitioner claims clean antecedent.

5 . Learned counsel for the State and informant opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the fact that both the parties were major when the relationship developed between them and informant was well aware of such relationship and its consequences and as such, the same will not amount to any criminal offence , in the event of arrest or surrender within eight weeks from today, let the petitioner, as named above , be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned SDJM Sadar Sitamarhi in connection with Parsauni P.S. case No. 93 of 2025 , subject to the conditions laid down under section 482 ( 2 ) of BNSS 2023 .

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top