SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 3667

PATNA HIGH COURT
Prabhat Kumar Singh, J
Bipin Bhagat @ Bipin Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Ms. Mira Kumari
For the Respondents: Mr. Yogendra Kumar

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

2 22-01-2026 At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has prayed for and is granted permission to make correction in paragraph no. 3 of the main petition.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

3. Petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191 (2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 127(2), 103(1), 303(2), 308(6), 326(g), 324(6), 352, 351(2) and 351(3) Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita .

4. As per F.I.R., all the named accused persons along with 10-15 unknown persons, armed with pistols and weapons, came to the house of informant and on the order of co-accused Guddu Yadav, other co-accused persons attacked the house sprinkled petrol and set the house of informant on fire as a result of which, husband of the informant was burnt alive.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits and petitioner is not named in the F.I.R.. His name transpired during course of investigation in confessional statement of co-accused with allegation that this petitioner was also involved in the alleged occurrence. Allegation against petitioner is general and omnibus. It is further submitted tha

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top