PATNA HIGH COURT
Prabhat Kumar Singh, J
Prince Kumar S/O Ashok Bhagat R/O Village- Koiriya Nizamat, P.S- Paru, Distt.- Muzaffarpur (Bihar). – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.4017 of 2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the nature of accusations in context of serious allegations. (Para 3) |
| 2. arguments against bail and considerations of time in custody. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's final decision to grant bail. (Para 6) |
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
5 22-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the appellants, respondent no. 2 and the State.
2. This appeal has been filed against the order dated
29.08.2025 passed by learned Special Judge, SC/ST(POA) Act, Muzaffarpur in connection with Paru P.S. Case No. 334 of 2025 registered under Sections 191 (2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 109, 103(1), 352, 351(2), 351(3) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita , Section 27 of the Arms Act and Section 3 (i)(r)(s) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act , whereby the prayer for regular bail of appellants has been rejected.
3. As per the prosecution case, while informant was at his medicine shop, his brother Jitendra Kumar Bhagat came to call him for dinner. He alleges that these appellants along with other persons armed with weapons came to his medicine shop and co-accused Arvind Bhagat abused and fired upon his brother due to which he died and Shambhu Bhagat also fired upon Jai Prakash Bhagat. He further alleged that Ashok Bhagat fired at informant with an intention to kill. Mahesh Ram who is Panch of Gram Panchayat was also attacked and abused by taking caste name.
4. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that due to land-boundary dispute between the parties, maar-peet took place in which both sides sustained injuries. Case and counter case. Specific accusation is against co-accused Shambhu Bhagat and Ashok Bhagat. So far these appellants are concerned, there is no allegation of any overt act against them. Appellants are in custody since 24.06.2025. Charge-sheet has already been submitted.
5. Learned Spl. Public Prosecutor for the State as well as learned counsel for the respondent no. 2 vehemently opposed the bail application.
6. Considering the nature of accusation and period of custody, this Court sets aside the impugned order and directs the release of above named appellants on bail on furnishing bail- bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, SC/ST(POA) Act, Muzaffarpur in connection with Paru P.S. Case No. 334 of 2025.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.