SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 3687

PATNA HIGH COURT
Prabhat Kumar Singh, J
Indra Devi W/o Lalbabu Pandey – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55207 of 2025|PS. Case No.-235 Year-2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners:Mr. Madhav Kumar, Advocate, Mr. Piyush Kumar Pandey, Advocate
For the Respondents: Mr. Umeshanand Pandit, APP

The court may grant anticipatory bail when allegations are general or omnibus, particularly when injuries are minor.

Headnote:In the case concerning allegations against the petitioners under various sections of the IPC and POCSO Act, the court analyzed general accusations and injury details revealing the simplicity of inflicted injuries. The court acknowledged that allegations appeared omnibus, considering land disputes among petitioners. Ultimately, the prayer for anticipatory bail was granted due to these circumstances.

Result: The petitioners are allowed bail upon specified conditions.

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

4 27-01-2026 Heard Mr. Madhav Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. Umeshanand Pandit, learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

2. Despite valid service of notice, nobody appears on behalf of the informant/Opposite Party No. 2.

3. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341 , 323, 324, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 8 and 12 of the POCSO Act .

4. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that these petitioners assaulted minor daughter of informant.

5. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus and no specific accusation of overt act has been alleged against these petitioners. Doctor has found the injuries, allegedly caused by these petitioners, simple in nature. As a matter of fact, petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case due to land dispute. Petitioners are ladies.

6. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, general and omnibus nature of accusation and nature of injuries sustained by the injured, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is allowed.

8. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-VI-cum-Special Court (POCSO), Samastipur in connection with Samastipur Muffasil P.S. Case No. 235 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S..

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top