SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 3692

PATNA HIGH COURT
PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH, J
Sushma Devi – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Sukesh Ranjan
For the Respondents: Mr. Rajendra Singh, APP

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

2 27-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State .

2. Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Sessions Trial No.161 of 2025 arising out of Harnaut P.S. Case No. 400 of 2024 in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 138 , 140(1), 140(3), 142 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 , later on 103(1), 238 and 61(2)

of the B.N.S. were also added.

3 . As per prosecution story, the son of the informant left his house and went to visit some fair but did not return and thereafter, the informant named the petitioners and other coaccused for being involved in the abduction of her son with intention of killing. Later on , the dead body of the son of the informant was found.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is quite innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that from perusal of the F.I.R. it is evident that informant is not the eye witness of the alleged occurrence and only a suspicion has been raised against this petitioner by the informant. During course of investigation none of the witnesses have clai

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top