SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 3695

PATNA HIGH COURT
Prabhat Kumar Singh, J
Prabha Kumari @ Devki Devi – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Rajeev Kumar
For the Respondents: Md. Fahimuddin

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

4 27-01-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends her arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 420 , 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code .

3. As per prosecution case, informant, namely Dr.

Ramcharitra Mandal, who happens to be Civil Surgeon, alleged that 14 persons, including this petitioner, obtained appointment on the post of “A.N.M. Nurse” on the basis of forged and fabricated documents and thereafter, their appointments were cancelled.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. Petitioner was appointed as A.N.M. Nurse after verification of all her certificates by the concerned department, but later on, same have been declared as forged and fabricated without proper verification or giving any notice to the petitioner. Moreover, the petitioner has already been removed from the services. However, it is submitted that at this stage, without admitting her guilt, petitioner is ready to deposit the whole remunera

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top