SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 3696

PATNA HIGH COURT
Prabhat Kumar Singh, J
Ramchandra Pandit – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1062 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Sandip Kumar Gautam
For the Respondents: Mr. Tarun Prasad Mandal, APP

Anticipatory bail can be granted when allegations are general and the accused has no prior criminal record.

Headnote:The judgment discusses the provisions under the Indian Penal Code for anticipatory bail, which was sought by the petitioner facing charges including 341 and 307 IPC. The court found that the allegations against the petitioner were general and did not indicate an overt act, and that the petitioner had clean antecedents. The court allowed the application for anticipatory bail, emphasizing the nature of the accusations and the petitioner’s earlier record. The ruling concludes with a directive for the petitioner to be released upon compliance with specified bail conditions.

Table of Content
1. arguments on behalf of the petitioner. (Para 4 , 5)
2. court's decision to grant bail. (Para 6)
3. directive for bail conditions. (Para 7)

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

2 28-01-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341 , 323, 307, 354, 324, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code .

3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that on

20.07.2022, co-accused Nitish Kumar entered into house of informant and tried to outrage her modesty. It is further alleged that thereafter, all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including this petitioner, came and assaulted informant and her family members with iron rod.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. From bare perusal of the F.I.R. it is apparent that specific accusation of overt act is against other co- accused persons. So far as this petitioner is concerned, there is general and omnibus allegation of assault and no specific accusation of overt act has been alleged against him. Petitioner claims clean antecedents.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, general and omnibus nature of accusation and clean antecedents of the petitioner, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is allowed.

7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusarai in connection with Baliya P.S. Case No. 195 of 2022, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S..

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top