SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 3697

PATNA HIGH COURT
Prabhat Kumar Singh, J
K. Faisal @ Kamran Faisal, Md. Basim Ansari – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1068 of 2026 | PS. Case No.-183 Year-2023



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Arvind Kumar
For the Respondents: Mr. Shantanu Kumar

Anticipatory bail granted based on the general nature of accusations and clean antecedents of the petitioners.

Headnote:Statute Analysis: The case pertains to Sections 147, 341, 323, 324, 307, 504, 506 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code. Facts of the Case: The petitioners apprehend arrest for assault and theft related to a land dispute.

Findings of Court:
The court allowed the anticipatory bail due to the general nature of allegations and the petitioners’ clean antecedents.

Issues: The court framed the question regarding the justification for anticipatory bail amidst serious accusations.

Ratio Decidendi: The court highlighted the need for specificity in allegations, and acknowledged that the injuries were found to be simple.

Result: The petitioners are granted anticipatory bail subject to conditions.

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

2 28-01-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147 , 341, 323, 324, 307, 504, 506 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code .

3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including these petitioners, assaulted informant, his father and mother. It is further alleged that these petitioners also committed theft in the house of informant.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. Both parties are Gotiyas and due to land dispute, this false and concocted case has been lodged. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus and no specific accusation of overt act has been alleged against these petitioners. Doctor has found the injuries, sustained by the injured, simple in nature. Rest of the allegations are superficial.

Petitioners claim clean antecedents.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, general and omnibus nature of accusation, nature of injuries sustained by the injured and clean antecedents of the petitioners, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is allowed.

7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Begusarai in connection with Ballia P.S. Case No. 183 of 2023, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S..

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top