SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 3699

PATNA HIGH COURT
PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH, J
Sabita Devi – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1089 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Shailendra Kumar Jha
For the Respondents: Mr. Binod Kumar

In anticipatory bail proceedings, the general and omnibus nature of accusations and clean antecedents of petitioners can justify the grant of bail.

Headnote:The petitioners, Sabita Devi and Surji Devi, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under several sections including 329(4) and 191(2). The court found the accusations general, without specific overt acts against the petitioners. The court ruled in favor of allowing the bail prayer based on the clean antecedents of the petitioners and the nature of the accusations. The final outcome permitted the petitioners to be released on bail under specific conditions.

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

2 28-01-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 329 (4), 191(2), 115(2), 126(2), 109, 76, 118(2), 303(2), 352 and 351(2)

3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including these petitioners, came and assaulted informant’s side with iron rod and also snatched gold Mangalsutra.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. As a matter of fact, on account of land dispute, simple maar-peet took place in which both sides sustained injuries. There is case and counter-case. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus and no specific accusation of overt act has been alleged against these petitioners. Rest of the allegations are ornamental in order to make the case grave.

Petitioners are ladies and claim clean antecedents.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, general and omnibus nature of accusation, case and counter-case and clean antecedents of the petitioners, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is allowed.

7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.-1st Class, Madhubani in connection with Babubarhi P.S. Case No. 133 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

shashank/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top