SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 3702

PATNA HIGH COURT
Mr. Prabhat Kumar Singh, J
Yogendra Singh – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Ranjit Kumar Thakur
For the Respondents: Mr. Umeshanand Pandit

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

2 28-01-2026 Heard Mr. Ranjit Kumar Thakur, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Umeshanand Pandit, learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 18 and 19 of the N.D.P.S. Act .

3. As per prosecution case, on raid, 127 plants of opium and 767 plants of doda were found on the land of this petitioner.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. Petitioner is himself a victim of circumstances. As a matter of fact, petitioner is a teacher in a government school at Muzaffarpur and presently, he is residing in Muzaffarpur with his family and has got no concern with the alleged cultivation over the land in question. It is further submitted that the land in secretion is in joint possession of the family of the petitioner and at present, the land is being cultivated by Shobhit Singh, who is own brother of this petitioner and simply because petitioner is co-owner of the land, he has falsely been implicated in thi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top