SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 3703

PATNA HIGH COURT
Prabhat Kumar Singh, J
Guleshwar Yadav @ Guli Yadav – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Bipin Kumar
For the Respondents: Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, APP

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

2 28-01-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 110, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. .

3. As per prosecution case, on a trivial issue of tying of buffaloes, all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including these petitioners, assaulted informant, his wife and daughter resulting in injuries to them.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. Petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case due to partition dispute between the parties. Petitioner No. 1 is father of the informant, Petitioner No. 2 is brother of the informant and Petitioner No. 3 is mother of the informant. It is further submitted that the alleged occurrence took place on 28.05.2025 whereas the present F.I.R. has been lodged after inordinate delay of 10 days on 07.06.2025 and there is no plausible explanation for the same which itself makes the entire pro

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top