Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
Mr. Prabhat Kumar Singh, J
Md. Akil @ Aakil Alam – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners assert innocence; delay in f.i.r. significant. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 2. court's decision on bail; conditions applied. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. application for anticipatory bail disposed. (Para 8 , 9) |
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
2 28-01-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, learned APP appearing on behalf of the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 76, 303(2), 352, 351(2), 351(3) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. .
3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that on
30.06.2025, all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including these petitioners, abused and assaulted informant and his family members.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. On account of petty dispute, maar- peet took place in which both sides sustained injuries. There is case and counter-case. Moreover, the present F.I.R. has been lodged after inordinate delay of four days and there is no plausible explanation for th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
