SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 3709

PATNA HIGH COURT
PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH, J
Ganauri Mahto – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.Sunil Kumar
For the Respondents: Mr.Usha Kumari

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

4 29-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the appellants and the State.

2. These appeals have been filed for setting aside order dated 24.01.2024 passed in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147 , 148, 149, 341, 323, 448,, 302, 504, 506 of the IPC and Sections 3 (i)(r)(s) and 3 (2) (va) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act 1989, whereby the prayer for anticipatory bail of the appellants have been rejected.

Re.-Cr. Appeal (SJ) No.1054 of 2024 & Cr. Appeal (SJ) No. 975 of 2024

3. As per F.I.R., this appellant and other two named accused abused by caste name and assaulted father of informant and threw him down from the roof due to which father of informant died on spot.

4. Considering the aforesaid facts, nature of accusation and other circumstances of the case, I do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order, accordingly these appeals are dismissed.

Cr. Appeal (SJ) No. 995 of 2024

5. As per F.I.R., specific allegation of assault is against co-accused Ganauri Mahto, Pankaj Kumar and Ramu Kumar.

6. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that allegation of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top