SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 3711

PATNA HIGH COURT
Prabhat Kumar Singh, J
Pankaj Kumar Singh @ Pankaj Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.1781 of 2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Ravi Shankar Pathak
For the Respondents: Mr. Sadanand Paswan, SPP

The absence of specific caste-based allegations under the SC/ST Act necessitates bail approval.

Headnote:Relevant provisions of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act were discussed. The case concerned allegations of outrage of modesty and caste-based abuse, where the appellant claimed to be falsely implicated due to prior conflicts. The court found the absence of specific allegations under the SC/ST Act leading to the conclusion that the appellant was entitled to bail, setting aside the lower court's order. The court primarily determined that the appeal should be allowed based on clean antecedents.

Table of Content
1. allegations of modesty outrage and caste abuse raised. (Para 3)
2. claim of false implication and counter complaint. (Para 4 , 5)
3. court observed the absence of sc/st allegations. (Para 6)
4. bail granted based on clean antecedents. (Para 7)

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

4 29-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the appellant, learned Special P.P. for of the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no. 2.

2. This appeal has been filed against the order dated

22.03.2024 passed by learned ADJ 61st cum Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Buxar, in connection with SC/ST P.S. Case No. 02 of 2024, registered under Sections 341 , 323, 504, 506, 354/34 of the Indian Penal Code , and Sections 3 (1)(r)(s), 3(2)(va) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act (for short “SC/ST Act”), whereby the prayer for anticipatory bail of appellant has been rejected.

3. As per prosecution case, on the alleged date and time of occurrence, the appellant entered into the house of the informant and tried to outrage her modesty. It is further alelged that at about 11.00 pm, all the named accused persons came to the house of the informant and abused her taking caste name.

4. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that appellants are co-villager and has been falsely implicated in this case to save her skin from the case lodged by appellant. The present case is a counter blast of Buxar Muffasil P.S. Case No. 54 of 2024 which was lodged prior to the present case against the husband of the informant. From perusal of F.I.R., there is no allegation of taking caste name against the appellant. Hence, no case of SC/ST Act is made out. Appellant claims clean antecedent.

5. Learned Spl. Public Prosecutor for the State and learned counsel for the respondent no. 2 vehemently opposed the appeal.

6. However, considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and clean antecedent, the impugned order dated 22.03.2024 is, hereby, set aside and this criminal appeal is allowed.

7. Let the appellant, as named above, be released on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ADJ 1st cum Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Buxar, in connection with SC/ST P.S. Case No. 02 of 2024.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top