SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 3714

PATNA HIGH COURT
PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH, J
Kavita Devi – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.Abhishek Kumar
For the Respondents: Mrs.Nirmala Kumari

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

2 29-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends her arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 103(1), 80(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S.

3. The informant alleged that his daughter was married to co-accused Arjun Prasad on 22.11.2024 and it is alleged that on 28.05.2025, the informant received an information that his daughter has been murdered. On inquiry, the informant came to know that his son-in-law had illicit relation with his Bhabhi (petitioner), which was objected by informant’s daughter and due to that reason, they committed her murder and absconded from the place of occurrence.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is simply a victim of false implication. Only on the basis of mere suspicion that this petitioner had illicit relation with husband of deceased, the informant, who is father of deceased, has falsely implicated her. Petitioner is own sister-in-

xksruh law ( ) of the deceased and she is separate in mess and property and has got no concern with the family affairs of deceased and her husband. Learned counsel fo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top