SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 3714

PATNA HIGH COURT
PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH, J
Kavita Devi – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1899 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.Abhishek Kumar
For the Respondents: Mrs.Nirmala Kumari

Anticipatory bail granted due to false implication and lack of evidence.

Headnote:The present case involves a petitioner apprehending arrest under B.N.S. sections for alleged links to her sister-in-law's murder. The court finds insufficient grounds for implication, grants anticipatory bail, and sets specific conditions to ensure compliance, basing the decision on the petitioner’s clean antecedent and lack of solid evidence.

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

2 29-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends her arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 103(1), 80(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S.

3. The informant alleged that his daughter was married to co-accused Arjun Prasad on 22.11.2024 and it is alleged that on 28.05.2025, the informant received an information that his daughter has been murdered. On inquiry, the informant came to know that his son-in-law had illicit relation with his Bhabhi (petitioner), which was objected by informant’s daughter and due to that reason, they committed her murder and absconded from the place of occurrence.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is simply a victim of false implication. Only on the basis of mere suspicion that this petitioner had illicit relation with husband of deceased, the informant, who is father of deceased, has falsely implicated her. Petitioner is own sister-in-

xksruh law ( ) of the deceased and she is separate in mess and property and has got no concern with the family affairs of deceased and her husband. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that there is no allegation of any demand of dowry or torture. As a matter of fact, on the alleged date of incident, there was some quarrel between deceased and her husband and out of anger & frustration, the deceased committed suicide by hanging. Doctor has also found cause of death, as Asphyxia due to hanging. Moreover, thrust of the accusation is against husband of the deceased, who is already in custody since

26.06.2025. Petitioner is lady and claims clean antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioner.

6. However, in the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1st Class, East Champaran, Motihari in connection with Garahiya Bazar P.S. Case No. 107 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482 of the B.N.S. S., 2023.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top