PATNA HIGH COURT
PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH, J
Vikash Kumar @ Bikash Kumar, Sushma Suman – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Bihar, Pushpalata Sharma – Respondent
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
5 29-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under section 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the IPC.
3. As per prosecution case, vide agreement dated
17.5.2018, petitioners took Rs.13.90 lacs for selling a piece of land in favour of opposite party no.2. Later on, petitioners neither executed the land nor did they return the amount taken by them from opposite party no.2.
4. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that these petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. Present case is counter blast of Complaint Case No. 250C/2021 instituted by petitioner no.1 against opposite party no.2 and in order to pressurize petitioners to withdraw the said complaint, instant case has been lodged. There is no signature of opposite party no.2 on the agreement. Moreover, case is of civil nature. Petitioners happen to be second party (Proposed transferee) to the agreement and opposite party no.2 has been shown as first party in the said document. Petitioners claim clean antecedent.
5. Learned counsel for the State and the opposite pa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.