SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 3717

PATNA HIGH COURT
PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH, J
PANKAJ KUMAR SINGH – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Eashita Raj
For the Respondents: Mr. Sadanand Paswan

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

3 29-01-2026 Despite filing Vakalatnama on behalf of the respondent no. 2, no one appears on behalf of the respondent no.

2.

2. Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned Special P.P. for of the State.

3. This appeal has been filed against the order dated

08.07.2021 passed by learned 1st ADJ cum Special Judge, SC/ST No. 76 of 2020, registered under Sections 323 ,, 384, 469, 471, 506 of the IPC and Sections 3 (i)(r)(s) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act (for short “SC/ST Act”), whereby the prayer for anticipatory bail of appellant has been rejected.

4. As per prosecution case, the informant alleged that he was working as a loan officer in Dighwara Branch of RBL Finserv Ltd. and the appellant no. 1 was also posted in the same branch. He further alleged that he faced a lot of discrimination, harassment and humiliation from the side of the appellants on the ground of caste. It is further alleged that whenever he refused to visit other branches they used to abuse him and conspired to implicate him in a false case.

5. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that appellants are innocen

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top