SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 3727

PATNA HIGH COURT
MR. PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH, J
Dilip Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69841 of 2025|PS. Case No.-223 Year-2024



Advocates:
For the Petitioner: Ms. Prerna Rishi
For the Respondents: Mr. Pronoti Singh, Mr. Dinbandhu Singh

The court determines that bail may be granted when the accused has no prior criminal record and the nature of accusations is general and omnibus.

Headnote:The judgment addresses the petitioner's plea for bail in a case under Sections 80 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. The petitioner was accused in the murder of the informant's sister after a marriage on 12.05.2022, alleged to have been committed due to dowry demands. The court found considerations including the nature of accusations, period of custody, and absence of prior criminal history favorable to granting bail. The court stated, 'Considering the facts and circumstances of the case...the prayer for grant bail of to the petitioner is allowed.' The petitioner is directed to furnish a bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/-.

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

4 30-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 80 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. .

3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that marriage of sister of informant was solemnized with this petitioner on 12.05.2022 and thereafter, all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including this petitioner, committed torture and harassment due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry and subsequently, committed her murder.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence.

Informant is not an eye witness to the occurrence. Petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case merely because he happens to be husband of the deceased. As a matter of fact, the deceased herself committed suicide. Moreover, charges have already been framed against the petitioner on 06.01.2026 and petitioner, having no criminal antecedents, is in custody since 02.08.2024.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant have vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner and submitted that petitioner is named in the F.I.R. with specific accusation that he, along with other accused persons, committed murder of sister of informant. Petitioner is husband of the deceased who died unnatural death at her matrimonial house within seven years of marriage.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, general and omnibus nature of accusation, period of custody, fact that charges have already been framed against the petitioner and clean antecedents, the prayer for grant bail of to the petitioner is allowed.

7. Accordingly, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Danapur, Patna in connection with Shahpur P.S. Case No. 223 of

2024.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top