SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 3728

PATNA HIGH COURT
Prabhat Kumar Singh, J
Chandan Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Dr. Kamal Deo Sharma
For the Respondents: Mr. Binod Kumar

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

4 30-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 80 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. .

3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that marriage of daughter of informant was solemnized with this petitioner on 13.05.2022 and thereafter, all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including this petitioner, committed torture and harassment due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry and subsequently, committed her murder.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence.

Informant is not an eye witness to the occurrence. Petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case merely because he happens to be husband of the deceased. As a matter of fact, the deceased herself committed suicide. Moreover, charges have already been framed against the petitioner on 21.11.2025 and petitioner, having no criminal antecedents, is in custody since 27.07.2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top