SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 3730

PATNA HIGH COURT
Mr. Prabhat Kumar Singh, J
Arbind Yadav – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76725 of 2025|PS. Case No.-361 Year-2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Ajay Mukherjee
For the Respondents: Mr. Rajendra Nath Jha, Mr. Nirmal Kumar

Accusations must be supported by substantial evidence; bail can be granted considering custody duration and prior records.

Headnote:The petitioner seeks bail for charges under various sections of the B.N.S. relating to embezzlement of food grains worth Rs. 29,23,392. The court finds the petitioner has been falsely implicated, has clean antecedents, and has been in custody since 13.08.2025. The court allows the bail considering the period of custody and the nature of accusations. The final ruling allows bail with specified conditions.

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

3 30-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the B.S.F.C..

2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 316(5), 318(4), 328, 336(3), 340(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S..

3. As per prosecution case, this petitioner is Member of the Managing Committee of Ahiro PACS which is alleged to have embezzled food grains worth Rs. 29,23,392/-.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. Petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case merely because he happens to be Member of the Managing Committee of Ahiro PACS. As a matter of fact, the entire transaction of purchase and supply of food grains was done by the Chairman and Manager of the Managing Committee of Ahiro PACS and petitioner has got no role to play in the alleged offence. Moreover, charge-sheet has already been submitted and petitioner, having no criminal antecedents, is in custody since

13.08.2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the B.S.F.C. have vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, general and omnibus nature of accusation, period of custody and clean antecedents of the petitioner, the prayer for grant bail of to the petitioner is allowed.

7. Accordingly, let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka in connection with Dhoraiya P.S. Case No. 361 of 2024.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top