SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 3734

PATNA HIGH COURT
Prabhat Kumar Singh, J
Lal Babu Rai @ Lalbabu Rai – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2071 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Dewendra Narayan Singh
For the Respondents: Ms. Asha Devi, APP

The court grants anticipatory bail considering familial relations and general nature of accusations.

Headnote:The petitioners sought anticipatory bail after being accused of multiple offenses under various sections of the B.N.S.. The allegations included abuse and assault during a familial dispute, presenting a case where claims of innocence and absence of specific accusations were made. The court noted the relationship between parties and the general nature of accusations, ultimately granting bail based on these considerations.

Result: The petitioners are granted anticipatory bail subject to specified conditions, including a bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- each.

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

2 31-01-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 352, 351(2), 303(2), 74 and 3(5) of the B.N.S. .

3. As per prosecution case, on alleged date and time of occurrence, all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including these petitioners, abused the informant, tried to outrage the modesty of daughter of informant and assaulted informant and her family members.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. As a matter of fact, both parties are close relatives of each other and happen to be descendants of the common ancestors. Dispute over path way led to simple maar- peet in which both sides sustained injuries. There is case and counter-case. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus and no specific accusation of overt act has been alleged against these petitioners. Petitioners claim clean antecedents.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, relationship between the parties, general and omnibus nature of accusation, case and counter-case and clean antecedents of the petitioners, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is allowed.

7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate- 1st Class, Saran at Chapra in connection with Dighwara P.S. Case No. 197 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S. S..

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top