SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 3748

PATNA HIGH COURT
Prabhat Kumar Singh, J
Dhananjay Bind – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Pranav Kumar Jha
For the Respondents: Mr. Shaheen Begum, APP

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

4 02-02-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned APP appearing for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 303(2), 317(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S. , Sections 4 and 21 of the M.M.D.R. Act and Section 56(ii) of the Bihar Minerals (Concession, prevention of illegal mining, transportation and storage) Rule.

3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that this petitioner, who happens to be owner of the seized tractor bearing Chassis No. EZ1SG454834SM and Engine No. 3100FL83G746910F3, along with other accused persons, is involved in illegal excavation, storage and transportation of sand.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. However, at this stage, without admitting his guilt, petitioner undertakes to deposit the revenue loss caused amounting to Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees five thousand).

Petitioner claims clean antecedents.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top