SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 3765

PATNA HIGH COURT
Prabhat Kumar Singh, J
Munna Paswan – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.Anil Kumar Singh
For the Respondents: Mr.Shyam Kumar Singh

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

2 04-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for offence under Sections 406 , 419, 420, 376, 504 of the Indian Penal Code .

3. It is alleged that this petitioner, on the false promise of marriage, made physical relation with the victim (informant) and subjected her to repeated sexual exploitation for three years i.e. from 2021 to 2023 and also took a motorcycle & Rs. 8 lakh cash from informant’s brother-in-law and thereafter, refused to solemnize marriage.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that from perusal of the F.I.R., it is apparent that both parties are major and they were in relationship for quiet some time. They enjoyed each others company for three years and indulged in sexual act, which cannot be said to be induced or involuntarily. The relationship was consensual. The informant was very much capable of understanding the consequences of her action and simply because the relationship could not work out, it will not give rise to institution of F.I.R. for the offence under Section 376 of the Indian Pena

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top