SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 3870

PATNA HIGH COURT
Prabhat Kumar Singh, J
Nitish Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Onkar Nath
For the Respondents: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, APP

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

2 11-02-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 366A of the Indian Penal Code .

3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that on 20.05.2024 at about 10 AM, minor daughter of informant aged about 15 years went to purchase some household articles but did not return. On search, informant came to know that all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including this petitioner, have kidnapped her minor daughter for the purpose of marriage.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. As a matter of fact, both parties are co- villagers and due to petty dispute, this false and concocted case has been lodged. It is further submitted that during investigation, the victim was recovered and her statement was recorded under Section 183 of the B.N.S.S. wherein she has denied the factum of kidnapping and has categorically stated that she herself left her house and went to her uncl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top