SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 3900

PATNA HIGH COURT
RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD, PRAVEEN KUMAR, JJ
Ravi Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellant: Mr. Kumar Kamal Nayan
For the Respondents: Mr. Bipin Kumar, APP

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD)

4 21-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. Despite of service on respondent No.2, she has chosen not to enter appearance in the matter.

3. The prosecution case is based on the written information furnished by the mother of the victim girl, who alleged that her daughter (‘X’), aged about 14 years, had left her house for going to studies, but she has been kidnapped by one Ravi Kumar, aged about 24 years, son of Anil Sah (the appellant).

4. It appears that the victim girl was recovered after eight days. Her statement under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. was recorded before a learned Magistrate on 08.09.2022. In her statement, she revealed that this appellant had called her over telephone and threatened her that if she would not come to meet him then her brother would be killed, whereafter she had gone to meet him. The appellant had taken her away to Dasrathpur from where she was taken to Jamalpur. She has further stated that at Jamalpur, she stayed with the appellant for e

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top