Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD, PRAVEEN KUMAR, JJ
Pintu Yadav @ Pintu Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of case facts regarding the alleged crimes. (Para 4) |
| 2. arguments presented challenging the evidences. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's observations on evidence and refusal of bail. (Para 7 , 8) |
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD)
4 29-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned Special Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. Records have been placed before this Court to consider the prayer of the appellant for suspension of his sentence and release on bail during pendency of the appeal.
3. The appellant has been convicted vide judgment dated
20.02.2025 and sentenced vide order dated 28.02.2025 in connection with Special Case No. 295 of 2022 arising out of Mahila P.S. Case No. 109 of 2022 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-VIII- cum-Special Judge, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, Nalanda, Bihar Sharif, (for short, ‘SC and ST (PoA) Act’) for the offence punishable under Sections 342 , 452 and 376 of the Indian Penal Code (in short ‘I.P.C.’) and Section 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST (PoA) Act and has been or
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
