SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 3994

PATNA HIGH COURT
Purnendu Singh, J
Munni Devi aged about 50 years, Vicky Kumar aged about 22 years, Chhotu Kumar @ Ravishankar Kumar aged about 20 years – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86314 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Brij Kishor Mishra
For the Opposite Party/s: Ms. Kumari Akanksha Rai, Mr. Sarvesh Kashyap, Mr. Ajay Kumar Jha

The court grants pre-arrest bail based on general allegations and mandates further inquiry into individual involvement.

Headnote:The petitioners, accused individuals, seek pre-arrest bail under Sections 80 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., alleging false implication in a dowry-related murder. The court finds general allegations against petitioners no. 2 and 3 persuasive for bail while calling for further inquiry on petitioner no. 1. The order permits bail for petitioners no. 2 and 3 upon conditions while further scrutiny is mandated for petitioner no. 1.

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER

2 16-01-2026 Heard Mr. Brij Kishor Mishra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners; Ms. Kumari Akanksha Rai, learned counsel for the informant and Mr. Ajay Kumar Jha, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners seek pre-arrest bail in connection offence punishable under Sections 80 and 3(5) of the B.N.S.

3. As per the allegation made in the FIR, petitioners along with other co-accused persons, had killed the daughter of the informant due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submitted that petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case. Petitioner no. 1 is mother-in-law and petitioners no. 2 and 3 are brother-in-law (Dewar) of the deceased. General and omnibus allegation has been levelled against the petitioners. Husband of the deceased namely, Santosh Sah is in jail. On these grounds, petitioners seek to be released on pre-arrest bail.

5. Learned counsel for the informant and learned APP for the State have vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail.

6. Considering the rival submissions made on behalf of the parties, as well as, allegation being general and omnibus against the petitioners no. 2 and 3, who are brother-in-law (Dewar) of the deceased, the petitioners no. 2 and 3, above named, are directed to be released on pre-arrest bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned District Court within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned District Court where the case is pending, in connection with laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

7. So far as petitioner no. 1, who is mother-in-law of the deceased, is concerned, call for up-to-date legible carbon copy/xerox copy of case diary in connection with the aforesaid case from the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Bettiah, West Champaran /court concerned.

8. The learned District Court is directed to verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioners no. 2 and 3 as stated in paragraph no. 3 of the bail application. If any other case is pending against the petitioners no. 2 and 3 as what has been stated in paragraph no. 3, this order will lose its force automatically.

9. Re-notify the present bail application on

16.02.2026.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top