PATNA HIGH COURT
PURNENDU SINGH, J
Nitish Kumar, Shobha Devi, Raj Kumar Paswan – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER
2 16-01-2026 Heard Mr. Md Irshad, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. Bishweshwar Ram, learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners seek pre-arrest bail in connection with Kabaiya P.S. Case No. 325 of 2025, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 96 , 3(5) of the BNS . 3. As per the allegation made in the FIR, petitioners had allegedly kidnapped the minor daughter of the inofrmant.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submitted that petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case. Victim in her statement recorded under Section 180 BNSS before the police, has not supported the prosecution case. However, statement of the victim recorded under Section 183 BNSS could not be brought on record. Petitioners have clean antecedent. On these grounds, petitioners seek to be released on pre-arrest bail.
5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail.
6. Considering the rival submissions made on behalf of the parties, learned District Court is directed verify the statement of the victim recorded under Section
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.