SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 4040

PATNA HIGH COURT
PURNDENDU SINGH, J
Rajesh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Sheo Kumar Prasad
For the Respondents: Mr. Rajeev Kumar, Mr. Nagendra Prasad

4 21-01-2026 Heard Mr. Sheo Kumar Prasad, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner; Mr. Rajeev Kumar, learned counsel for the complainant and Mr. Nagendra Prasad, learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection with Narhat P.S. Case No. 41 of 2025, registered for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 110, 351, 3(5) of the BNS and Sections 3 /4 of the D.P. Act .

3. As per the allegation made in the FIR, the marriage of the complainant was solemnized with the petitioner on as per Hindu Rites and Custom. After some time of marriage, petitioner and his other family members, had started demanding rupees eight lac from the parent of the informant and due to non-fulfillment of the same, they had subjected the informant to various sorts of torture and ousted her from her matrimonial house.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. He further submitted that petitioner always tries to lead a peaceful married life with the informant but she never co-operates with him on the instigation of her family members

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top