SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Pat) 4049

PATNA HIGH COURT
PURNENDU SINGH, J
Khushal Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Bihar – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.Abhishek Ranjan
For the Respondents: Mr.Anil Prasad Singh, APP

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER

6 21-01-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection with Mufassil (Motihari) P.S. Case No. 428/2024 registered for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 310(2) of the BNS .

3. As per the allegation made in the FIR, some unknown persons assaulted and robbed the informant and fled away leaving behind a motorcycle and a weapon.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner rather petitioner’s name has surfaced in the present case on the confessional statement of the co-accused Tribhuwan Kumar. The petitioner is having clean antecedent. On these grounds the petitioner seeks to be released on pre-arrest bail.

5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail.

6. Having considered the rival submissions made on behalf of the parties, as well, having perused the allegation made in the FIR and the fact that not

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top